accLogo

Blue Standard

Aquaculture Certification Council, Inc.

2/18/2008

Volume 3

Please visit us at the Boston Seafood Show Booth # 489 on Feb 24th – 26th

In This Issue

·    President’s Letter

·    BAP Certification Program Shows Exponential Growth in 2007

·    Setting the Standard for Social Responsibility in Aquaculture

·    Buyers and Importers Show Their Support for ACC Buyers Program

·    ACC Expands BAP Certification Program to Reprocessing and Repacking Facilities

·    Issues and Concerns Regarding the Use of Antibiotics and Other Chemotherapeutics in Aquaculture

Links

 

Processing Plant

Farm

Hatchery

 

Founding Supporters

hnexpack

Rubicon Resources

Rubicon Resources is headquarters for the vertically integrated Rubicon Group of food companies dedicated to supplying premium food products for the U.S. market.  It is a leading importer and distributor in North America. 

 

efc

Darden Restaurants

Darden Restaurants is the world's largest casual dining restaurant company. It owns and operates 1,300 Red Lobster, Olive Garden, Bahama Breeze, and Smokey Bones Barbeque & Grill restaurants worldwide.

 

 

fpi

 

Fishery Products International

Fishery Products International is the leading supplier of seafood to the North American foodservice, retail and warehouse club markets. Its R&D, culinary talent and consumer insights bring innovative seafood solutions to market.

 

seajoy

 

Seajoy

Seajoy is a vertically integrated and geographically diversified aquaculture group committed to providing premium-quality, farm-raised shrimp and fish on a year-round basis. Doing business with Seajoy is ...a joy.

 

 

Registered Buyers

Cumbrian Seafoods Limited

Hanwa American Corporation 

Hai Yang International, Inc.

Great American Seafood Imports Company

Maloney Seafood Corp.

International Marketing Specialists, Inc.(IMS)

Icelandic USA, Inc.

Orion Seafood International, Inc.

Export Packers, Ltd.

Kalmarine, Inc.

Expack Seafood, Inc.

H & N Foods International

Mazzetta Company, LLC 

Empress International, Ltd.

Tampa Bay Fisheries

Mid-Pacific Seafoods

Lyons Seafood, Ltd.

Rubicon Resources

Eastern Fish Company

Pacific Supreme Company

Aqua Star

OFI Markesa International

SeaPak Shrimp Company

Fishery Products International

Contact Us

President’s Letter

 

In 2007, ACC certified or recertified 78 aquaculture facilities, consisting of two hatcheries, 22 farms and 54 processing or reprocessing plants, representing approximately 285,000 metric tons of finished shrimp product.  ACC has a roster of 84 active highly qualified inspectors/auditors located in 24 countries worldwide.

BAP standards were recently published for seafood processing plants, expanding the scope beyond shrimp processing. ACC has already received several applications for certification. The BAP standards for tilapia and catfish farms are very close to completion and should be published by April for catfish and June for tilapia.

In 2007, ACC began the process for ISO 65 certification. When certified, ACC will be recognized by the International Organization for Standards as operating a product certification system that is competent and reliable. This will add significantly to ACC’s status as a third party, independent certifying organization. The reviewers have commented that ACC’s existing systems and procedures are well above the average.  We should be able to qualify for the first stage of ISO 65 certification by the end of this year.  ACC also will have a person trained in ISO 9001 to manage quality management systems and ACC is planning to sponsor an ISO 22000 course for the inspectors/auditors. 

 

tilapia - piscina de cultivo 04

 

Further regarding ACC’s administrative procedures, the process by which facilities apply for certification, the preliminary analysis and recommendations, inspection and corrective action required for certification are becoming increasingly standardized and are set forth in detail on the ACC website. So are the basic criteria for certification, the inspection and audit definitions, the scoring system, and the detailed list of certified facilities and qualified inspectors/auditors. This standardization and transparency are vital components of ACC’s reputation as an impartial, objective third party certification organization.

 

Fig.1 US tilapia imports increased 9% in 2007 to 174,000 metric tons.

 

 

In 2007 the number of BAP certified facilities increased by 67% as compared to 2006. As of December 31, 2007 there were a total of 60 certified processing plants, 42 farms, and 20 hatcheries located in 13 different countries that have been certified by the Aquaculture Certification Council.

 

Since the ACC begin certifying facilities for the Best Aquaculture Practices program in 2003, over 189 facilities have registered for BAP certification, of which 65% have been able to comply with the BAP standards to be certified or recertified.

 

The quantity of BAP certified farm product increased substantially in 2007 and there are now eight Three-Star BAP certified facilities that can supply 40,000 metric tons of BAP certified farm shrimp and another 52 One-Star certified plant facilities that are packing over 250,000 metric tons of BAP certified product.

 

In October, the ACC begin to certify seafood processing plants that are packing shrimp and tilapia, and to date two facilities plants have been certified in China. In the second quarter of 2008, the ACC will begin certifying tilapia and catfish farms that have met BAP certification requirements.

 

In January, three farms own by the Naturisa Group in Ecuador and the Good Luck cluster farm in Thailand were BAP certified. The ACC now had certified 24 farms in Ecuador that collectively produced more than 14,200 metric tons of BAP farm certified product.

 

Two plants in China, Savvy Seafoods (Zhanjiang) and Asia Seafoods Zhanjiang also completed BAP certification in January. China now has seven BAP certified seafood processing plants.

 

Today’s seafood consumers are confronted with a wide selection of Certified product options at their supermarket or seafood restaurant. Most companies state that the product they are selling is safe and of high quality, and consumers can trust that it is a good choice for themselves and their families. Likewise, aquaculture facilities receiving Best Aquaculture Practices certification must meet the same industry standards for safety and quality.

 

What differentiates BAP certified seafood from others can be summed up by the four words found on its seal: “Wholesome Seafood, Responsibly Produced”. This means that consumers purchasing BAP certified product can be sure that it is safe and of high quality, but also that the people involved in its production were treated fairly and responsibly. Social responsibility is a key component of the BAP standard, and the Aquaculture Certification Council takes its role very seriously.

 

Initial BAP standards for social responsibility were designed to parallel those of Social Accountability International (SAI), a non-profit partner of the Council on Economic Priorities. SAI created the Social Accountability 8000 standard (SA 8000) to include the international human rights defined by the International Labour Organisation, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The BAP standards have been modified to incorporate the SA 8000 standards for aquaculture certification, and the BAP standards for social responsibility continue to evolve.

 

According to the current BAP standard, every facility that applies for certification must undergo an inspection where their commitment to social responsibility is measured. They must meet the BAP standards for Community Relations, Worker Safety and Employee Relations.

 

Aquaculture facilities receiving BAP certification must have a good relationship with their neighbors and their community. They must regularly coordinate and meet with local leaders and the community. Facility operators and workers must respect all religious, cultural, and traditional beliefs and practices of the local community. Also, facilities must accommodate local inhabitants by not blocking traditional fishing areas, mangroves, and other public access.

 

Adequate worker safety and good employee relations must also be ensured to receive BAP certification. In addition to complying with national Minimum Wage and Child Labor Laws, a facility must provide healthy and safe food and water, adequate sanitary facilities for all workers, and housing for workers if local lodging is not available. Workers must also have access to medical care on the facility and all facilities must have an emergency response plan in place.

 

By implementing these social responsibility standards, BAP holds seafood growers and producers to the highest standard. People buying product with the BAP mark can be confident that they are getting not only quality seafood, but that everyone along the production chain has their rights protected and their well-being ensured. Truly, wholesome seafood, responsibly produced.

Blue Standard Picture-ACM2

Fig. 2 BAP facility representatives meet with community members in Ecuador.

Buyers and Importers Show Their Support for ACC Buyers Program

 

The ACC has recently completed a revision and update of its Registered Buyers Program. Companies participating in the program are showing their support for preferential purchasing of product that is responsibly produced, processed and identified as BAP product that is traceable to its origin.

 

Those who enroll in the program are listed on the ACC website (www.aquaculturecertification.org) and have access to information regarding where to locate certified, wholesome product that has gone through a third-party traceability program to maintain product identity. Participants may also realize some marketing advantages.

 

Participation in the program allows registered companies access to information from facilities selling BAP certified product and certain portions of the online Traceability information which allows them to identify and segregate specific product units rather than container quantities.

 

As of January 23, 2008 there are 24 participants in the program. The cost to participate in this important program is $1,000 per year. Interested parties should contact the ACC office at aquacert@comcast.net.

 

 

 

 

Some of the product that is being packed at BAP processing plants in Third-World countries ends up in plants that are reprocessing and/or repacking product for sale to food service companies and retailers who want the product to be BAP certified, marked with the BAP logo and traceable to the facility where it was produced and/or processed.

 

In order for the ACC to ensure the integrity of the BAP certification and the BAP logo and to trace the product throughout the chain of custody, facilities that are repacking BAP product must also be BAP certified. Certified plants are required to have their own unique plant identification number on the packaging along with the identification number of the facility where the product was originally packed. The use of both plant ID number allows the ACC to trace product identity to the country of origin, the processing plant where it was packed and in the case of BAP farm certified product, to the production facility and date of harvest.

 

Companies that are repacking and reprocessing BAP product but not subscribing to BAP certification, cannot place the BAP logo on their packaging or advertise that the product is BAP certified.

 

For more information on the BAP certification program for repacking facilities, you can contact the ACC office at aquacert@comcast.net.

Issues and Concerns Regarding the Use of Antibiotics and Other Chemotherapeutics in Aquaculture

 

William R. More

Aquaculture Certification Council, Inc.

aquacert@comcast.net

 

The problem of residues of antibiotics and chemotherapeutics in edible tissues of aquaculture products is attracting worldwide attention and there is a need to enhance public awareness and understanding on the use of drugs and chemicals in aquaculture.

 

Many countries engaged in aquaculture have few regulatory controls are documented records of drugs and chemical used in the industry.  Additionally, the cost of testing for residues is expensive and equipment and standard analytical methods to measure residuals of misused and banned drugs are often lacking in third world countries.

 

Of equal concern is the effect of drugs and chemicals used on human health.  Many of the drugs used in aquaculture pose health risks to workers and the accumulation of residues in the culture species being consumed is a food safety concern.

 

Banned and restricted drugs and chemicals should never be used in aquaculture and approved and/or registered drugs should only be used as a last resort when other disease management techniques do not work.  Drugs and hormones used in feed as growth promoters or to enhance reproduction are discouraged and most are banned or not registered for use in aquaculture.

 

Recommendations for the safe use of antibiotics and chemicals in the aquaculture industry include:

·         Following a set of protocols ensuring that the compound is used in a manner that is consistent with limiting adverse environmental impacts and impacting public health.

·         Selecting drugs based on not only efficiency data but also on available information regarding environmental persistence, potential effects on non-target organisms and the propensity to stimulate microbial resistance. Aquaculture producers should be encouraged to purchase only therapeutics and chemicals that are properly labeled with instructions regarding the use.

Today, aquaculture producers have choices when it comes to using antibiotics and other chemotherapeutics and there is a wealth of information available on which ones should be used and how to use them.  Aquaculture drugs should be properly labeled with an expiration date with information in the principal local languages.  The information should include active ingredients, intended use, route of treatment, potential environmental and health hazards, how to treat the species involved, and how to store and dispose of the chemicals.

 

Aquaculture drugs and chemicals should not be the first option when combating disease, but used as a last resort after environmental conditions, nutrition and hygiene have been optimized. Prophylactic treatments should be avoided when possible since development of antibacterial resistance poses a threat to long term efficacy of a drug.

BAP Required Tests for Antibiotics Used in Aquaculture

Component

Limit

Acceptable Test

Chloramphenicol

Detectable limit
0.3 ppb

Ridascreen (ELISA)

Nitrofurans

Detectable limit of component/metabolites
1 ppb

Ridascreen (AOZ, AMOZ)

Malachite Green, Leucomalachite Green

Detectable limit
2 ppb

LC/MSn  or LC/VIS

Fluroquinolones / Quinolones

Detectable limit

HPLC/MS/MS

Sarafloxacine

1.25 ppb

HPLC/MS/MS

Ciprofloxacine

1.25 ppb

HPLC/MS/MS

Endrofloxacine

1.25 ppb

HPLC/MS/MS

Flumequine

2.5 ppb

HPLC/MS/MS

Oxolinic acid

2.5 ppb

HPLC/MS/MS

 

anti

Fig. 3 BAP Certification Requires Testing for Banned Antibiotics, like Furazolidone

 

AQUACULTURE CERTIFICATION COUNCIL, INC.
12815 72nd Avenue Northeast
Kirkland, Washington 98034 USA
Telephone: +1-425-825-7935 · Fax: +1-425-650-3001
Web: www.aquaculturecertification.org
E-mail:
info@aquaculturecertification.org This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it